view

JUDICIAL RECUSAL AND REMOVAL — A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE NEW ZEALAND WILSON SAGA

JUDICIAL RECUSAL AND REMOVAL — A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE NEW ZEALAND WILSON SAGA

Click here to read the article

Abstract: This article provides a critical and comparative analysis of the saga involving Justice Wilson of the New Zealand Court of Appeal. The saga provides a backdrop for a discussion of judicial bias and judicial recusal, as well as the complaints and removal system, in Australia and New Zealand. Reference is made to selected episodes involving recusal applications in Australia and the United States. The article also explores whether a register of pecuniary interests of judicial offi cers should be mandated by statute.

Keywords: bias; judicial recusal; Justice Wilson; judicial complaints; judicial removal; register of pecuniary interests

Click here to read the article

You may also like

Elaine Fahey

FUTURE-MAPPING THE DIRECTIONS OF EU LAW: HOW DO WE PREDICT THE FUTURE OF EU LAW?
Massimo Fichera

FRAMING EU CONSTITUTIONAL TIME: A FUTURE-ORIENTED THEORY OF CONSTITUTIONAL CHANGE FOR THE EU
Michael WR Adams and HP Lee

Author's other articles in JICL
JUDICIAL RECUSAL AND REMOVAL — A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF THE NEW ZEALAND WILSON SAGA
VOLUME DECEMBER 2015
EDITORIAL
VOLUME DECEMBER 2018

View PDF file

View PDF file

View PDF file

View PDF file

Login/Register

Submissions

JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.

We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.

To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.

Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.

Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.

Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.

Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.cooray.1@city.ac.uk.

Style Guide

Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.

JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.