view
Abstract: In negotiations leading to independence, the British government and local representatives explored ways on ensuring legal certainty and continuity, especially in matters of commercial and maritime law. In the Federation of Malaysia, an ordinance was enacted a year before Independence to provide for the reception of English mercantile law (including shipping law) statutes until the gaps are filled by the local legislature. For the constituent states in the federation, which were protectorates previously, there was a cut-off date being applied to the received statutes, namely 7 April 1956. For states which were former colonies, under direct rule, the reception of English statutes was on a continuing basis. In mercantile matters jurisdiction is vested in two High Courts in a federation of 13 negeris and three federal territories, but without a single, unified set of received mercantile laws. This article tests if an internal application of the doctrine of forum conveniens, amongst other solutions, might help ensure a degree of legal certainty and clarity.
Keywords: reception of English statutes; former British colonies and protectorates; commercial maritime law; forum non conveniens; federal systems
JICL welcomes full length articles (generally not exceeding 13,000 words inclusive of footnotes), shorter contributions in the form of notes and comments (generally not exceeding 8,000 words inclusive of footnotes) and book review articles of not more than 6,000 words.
We accept contributions for consideration on an exclusive submission basis. When submitting an article please certify that it is an unpublished article (that is, it has not been previously published in substantially similar form or with substantially similar content) and that it is not under consideration by any other journal.
To facilitate anonymous review, please give the names of authors and their short biographical information and acknowledgments in a separate page.
Authors retain copyright in the words used, but upon submission of material for publication, grant Sweet & Maxwell a licence to publish the submission in print and/or digital formats. Sweet & Maxwell retains copyright in the design, format and layout of all material published in JICL.
Once submissions are published, authors are entitled to one copy of the issue, 10 offprint copies and a PDF version of the submission.
Authors who send articles published in JICL to other publishers or media must include a reference to the publication of the article by JICL and Sweet & Maxwell.
Contributions and book reviews should be submitted in Microsoft Word format by way of email attachment to Professor Anton Cooray at Anton.cooray.1@city.ac.uk.
Authors should follow the OSCOLA citation system (http://www.law.ox.ac.uk/publications/oscola.php), except that we prefer authors to use indenting sparingly.
JICL uses the following heading levels: Main headings are in bold and preceded by a Roman numeral; second-level headings are in bold and italics and preceded by an uppercase alphabet; third-level headings are preceded by an Arabic numeral; and fourth-level headings are in italics and preceded by a lowercase alphabet.